October 30, 2010
My anger is not against my world but myself. I wish I could see things differently most of the time. Mostly in a literal sense, but metaphorical as well. When I'm driving I see that the blue splotchy sky would be beautiful if those damn power lines weren't interrupting my view. The park would be beautiful if those damn brightly colored plastic slides weren't jutting up from the cement slab someone just needed there. I see my world interrupted. I see beauty distorted. I see things that I wish I could not. I am blessed to see. This ability also makes me anxious. I want to look people in the eye and have conversation. I want to share seeing with other people. I want to show what I can see. But what I see is ugly. I see the baby plants struggling to break through pavement. It is most simply speaking, due to my eyes that I can see, of course. But what can eyes show you? Portraits were made for an audience and I downright hate them. Thus, my challenge. When taking portraits eyes are not even focusing on the photographer but the glass lens behind which one of the photographer's own eyes interprets. What can you interpret from staring eyes outside of conversation? Can these eyes show you that I'm struggling to pay rent, that I'm lost beyond belief, that I'm trying? What is the draw to portraiture? Can you show a concept through simple reflections?
Labels:
Jacki
October 27, 2010
Update
So, you saw my first legs of my one journey in the images below...Let me just tell you how terrifying it really was, but again, doing it is making me find out a lot about myself, my photography and why I do the things I do. I think the bottom image for me is the most revealing of creating emotion for me personally. Not that I am personally attached to the image, but I see something I have never seen or felt before.... Its not about the fact that I am trying to understand nudity and how to shoot it because I have been denied it in the past, but seeing bits of myself. I was stumped and at a loss of what to shoot...so I shot myself...holy shit...did that start something and say a lot to me...I will tell you what as I continue to follow this path and shoot more and see where it goes.
Second process starts next week...I am hitting the strip clubs...update later.
Labels:
Mary
Why I Am Not a Painter...
I am not a painter, I am a poet.
Why? I think I would rather be
a painter, but I am not. Well,
for instance, Mike Goldberg
is starting a painting. I drop in.
"Sit down and have a drink" he
says. I drink; we drink. I look
up. You have SARDINES in it."
"Yes, it needed something there."
"Oh." I go and the days go by
and I drop in again. The painting
is going on, and I go, and the days
go by. I drop in. The painting is
finished. "Where's SARDINES?"
All that's left is just
letters, "It was too much," Mike says.
But me? One day I am thinking of
a color: orange. I write a line
about orange. Pretty soon it is a
whole page of words, not lines.
Then another page. There should be
so much more, not of orange, of
words, of how terrible orange is
and life. Days go by. It is even in
prose, I am a real poet. My poem
is finished and I haven't mentioned
orange yet. It's twelve poems, I call
it ORANGES. And one day in a gallery
I see Mike's painting, called SARDINES.
-Frank O'Hara (1926-1966)
Why? I think I would rather be
a painter, but I am not. Well,
for instance, Mike Goldberg
is starting a painting. I drop in.
"Sit down and have a drink" he
says. I drink; we drink. I look
up. You have SARDINES in it."
"Yes, it needed something there."
"Oh." I go and the days go by
and I drop in again. The painting
is going on, and I go, and the days
go by. I drop in. The painting is
finished. "Where's SARDINES?"
All that's left is just
letters, "It was too much," Mike says.
But me? One day I am thinking of
a color: orange. I write a line
about orange. Pretty soon it is a
whole page of words, not lines.
Then another page. There should be
so much more, not of orange, of
words, of how terrible orange is
and life. Days go by. It is even in
prose, I am a real poet. My poem
is finished and I haven't mentioned
orange yet. It's twelve poems, I call
it ORANGES. And one day in a gallery
I see Mike's painting, called SARDINES.
-Frank O'Hara (1926-1966)
Labels:
Sam
October 26, 2010
Strangely...
...it seems that this blog's gone fairly silent since this semester's inaugural Photo Phantastic meeting. Just an observation.
Labels:
Shane
October 22, 2010
Something to remember: and said by my bestest friend, Annie Leibovitz
"Photography’s like this baby that needs to be fed all the time. It’s always hungry. It needs to be read to, taken care of. I had to nourish my work with different approaches."
One doesn't stop seeing. One doesn't stop framing. It doesn't turn off and turn on. It's on all the time. We just have a tendency to suppress it."
Labels:
Mary
October 20, 2010
October 19, 2010
Photo Phantastic is Back!
So...Our first meeting is happening this Wednesday for the new Photo Phantastic group 2.0. I am beyond excited because it looks like we are going to have a great turnout and alot of old members. Sam C., Chris, Adam and Jacki are all coming I think... Chris and Adam have a ton of new work, so I am really excited to see it. They are also going to really focus in on the business side, but also keeping the art instilled. I am pumped and will miss our other members so much! I wish you could be here... Sam, Jacki and I will keep you updated on how it goes and the turnout!
Labels:
Mary
Simplify,
don't make things more complicated than they have to be.
I wish I could go to the MOMA... there's a Jeff Wall exhibit that would be amazing to see!
I was going to say to always read the essays and interviews, but are there times when maybe you shouldn't? Does putting too many words to an image or process overcomplicate it?
Instinctively, I vote no.. simply because I feel like I can make the words and the photographs two separate entities.. but I want to hear your thoughts.
Labels:
Monica
October 18, 2010
Replace "essayist's" with "photographer's"
"There is something heroic in the essayist's gesture of striking out toward the unknown, not only without a map but without certainly that there is anything worthy to be found." -Lopate
It is not my wisdom I wish to impart. I have none. It is the wisdom of all the great artists, scientists, thinkers who came before this moment. If you know (if you think you know), then stop. Simply. If you don't know, congratulations; you may journey. Walking from your bed to the refrigerator is rarely a journey. Entering a foreign wilderness with only curiosity can only be one.
You can be great if you shed yourself of you. You wants to think it knows. It's the part that knows it doesn't that will yield wondrous work. Discover.
Blah. Blah. Blah. Your turn...
Labels:
Shane
The Greatest Living Photographer?
OK, so I don't believe in such a thing. But he's MY Greatest Living Photographer!
Alec Soth
Jacki, Mary, and Sam: pay particular attention to 'Niagara' and 'Broken Manual'. Each project uses ephemera in addition to his environmental portraits, etc.
Labels:
Shane
October 17, 2010
Short shorts/ no shorts
With recent blogging confusion I thought I would use this as an opportunity for all of us to sort out our thoughts about nude photography and grow from it. I respect each of you as artists and there is no reason to shy away from tit (i mean...it), or try to avoid the subject. So... what are your thoughts about nude photography?
Through many thoughts/discussions I tried to sort this subject out from my first venture into photo class. It is ALWAYS a difficult aspect for me to contain in writing. I could write pages about it. But since the door is open I'll give a few of my thoughts on nude photography in hopes that this can continue to be a space where we are not hindered by our possible disagreements but write about them, as to gain perspective.
I think the human body is beautiful. I think it is a wonderful canvas upon which many colors and light situations can interact in a co-mingled way that cannot be found on any other surface. Skin is a wonder to me. It intrigues me. I find skin one of the most lovely things in the world. Due to this fascination, I never doubt why photographers explore how a body/skin can be used within the frame of a photo. Along with this visage comes a whole background of pressured stereotypes and societal role-play. What does a naked body suggest? To even mention the word suggest... I feel as though I'm already pointing out a scandalous nature. But why does an unclothed body have a scandalous label? Frankly, it doesn't have to, it never has to. Organically speaking, it is unnatural to wear clothes. Had nobody told you that you were naked, would you have known? But in terms of modesty today, where is the line/what is the boundary? I think we all face this every morning. Do we consider our appearance (in clothing) as a defining factor? Does this not only define our place in society but our inward views? I would argue yes.
Back to the visage of body in photos. As an artist I must digest the facet of photography that the product of photo can never censor thoughts experienced when viewed. What one person sees as color/placement/canvas another can see as sexual. How one person might respond to a photo is not how every person will respond. How then, do I respond to nudity in photos? In a complicated manner... I think that a body can serve as a strong element of a photograph. But it is not necessary. I think that it takes a strong photographer to use a body in a way to display something other than a suggestive sexual nature. Take these photos for example:
Bill Durgin. Master of sculpture.
Sarah Kaufman. http://www.sarahkaufmanphoto.com/
Master of color/light. While nudes are used within frame, it becomes more-so apparent to me that Sarah can SEE color and light. The body completes the photograph in secondary nature for me. For me, the body comments to the already present light and color situation. It takes on the color and light of the environment as well as giving off it's own color and light. I argue that the bodies within frame are not posed for sexual connotation. But that does not negate the fact that one could consider these as sexual images. The best way to sum up my thoughts most recently above: Even in the best effort to reduce a body to purely interacting as canvas within frame, or in the most innocent attempt to portray nudity as secondary it can always potentially be misread. This is such with any photograph. Our ideas/concepts explored as artists cannot speak for what the audience might see. This is why I find critique time so crucial. I cannot see what others can. I can choose to see.
Sally Mann.
etc.
While I think that it is an artist few and far between that can use body in a way that is not taken as immediately sexual, the subject will always intrigue me. Why do we find certain images sexual, etc.? Thomas Ruff, what of his work?
It is never my place to disregard the work of another artist. If someone is to pursue the subject of nudity I encourage them to write, to research, to blog. (as any artist should do with any subject being explored) What does nudity truly mean to you? Why include it/why not? Can a photo with a nude be purely done for beauty or composition or light? Even if you don't know the answers, or how to find them, consider everything; always.
As an artist I disagree with the subject of nudity being explored only because of the fact that it has become an immediately responsive subject. I disagree with including nudity only for the fact of creating tension due to a society pressured take on a naked body. I disagree with a lot of (what I see as) sexual disturbing art. But in the same token, I cannot disregard it. I need to face the art world, if you will, and all that it is.
In a whirlwind of the past few weeks, I have been both at center of exploring personal nudity and being subject of such. I will not disregard this. I will embrace what became of it. My body is my own. How I choose to protect it is ultimately my own decision. While it is easy to get caught up in the passion of photography, in the sweat, tears, and laughter that come from the process, I have to respect myself and who I am to others. To be the most honest that I have been on this blog... I trust this audience. But regardless, you are all still an audience. And as far as comfort goes... no, comfort is not always good. I also cannot disregard how others might view my body.
Being an artist is one facet of my life. It is in the midst (the marshmallow between graham crackers and chocolate) of my soul, my beliefs, my passions, my desires, my love for another, my day-to-day life. My art is an extension of my labels, my definitions from others, my own definitions about myself. It is not always easy to encompass title of artist, as many relate me to delusional, moody, free-spirited, poor, loser, psychotic (which, I'm not arguing that I'm not those things). But with that comes the idea that I have to sort of give in to what art has a reputation of being... sexual, unmoving, simple, stupid, etc. That is bull. I am Jacki. All of you using this space know me fairly well. I don't create because it comes easy to me. I don't create enlarged guns made of life savers and accept an award for that long worked half-hour. I don't create misspelled (sp?) ... band posters. I create because it lights a fire in my soul, it challenges me as a person to question my motives, my placement, my life. It makes me feel really fucking mad and lost most of the time. Being an artist means that I can create, it also means that I have to embrace my faults, my discomforts, my fears. Creating means that I must stand up to what I believe I need to and respect where I somehow fall in the middle of many other entangled thoughts, concerns, perceptions, and worries. I have to respect who I choose to love. That won't change.
I am a body. I am a canvas. I am hands, arms, teeth, hair, legs, back, shoulders, ovaries, eyes. I am living. I am growing (physically/metaphorically).
Through many thoughts/discussions I tried to sort this subject out from my first venture into photo class. It is ALWAYS a difficult aspect for me to contain in writing. I could write pages about it. But since the door is open I'll give a few of my thoughts on nude photography in hopes that this can continue to be a space where we are not hindered by our possible disagreements but write about them, as to gain perspective.
I think the human body is beautiful. I think it is a wonderful canvas upon which many colors and light situations can interact in a co-mingled way that cannot be found on any other surface. Skin is a wonder to me. It intrigues me. I find skin one of the most lovely things in the world. Due to this fascination, I never doubt why photographers explore how a body/skin can be used within the frame of a photo. Along with this visage comes a whole background of pressured stereotypes and societal role-play. What does a naked body suggest? To even mention the word suggest... I feel as though I'm already pointing out a scandalous nature. But why does an unclothed body have a scandalous label? Frankly, it doesn't have to, it never has to. Organically speaking, it is unnatural to wear clothes. Had nobody told you that you were naked, would you have known? But in terms of modesty today, where is the line/what is the boundary? I think we all face this every morning. Do we consider our appearance (in clothing) as a defining factor? Does this not only define our place in society but our inward views? I would argue yes.
Back to the visage of body in photos. As an artist I must digest the facet of photography that the product of photo can never censor thoughts experienced when viewed. What one person sees as color/placement/canvas another can see as sexual. How one person might respond to a photo is not how every person will respond. How then, do I respond to nudity in photos? In a complicated manner... I think that a body can serve as a strong element of a photograph. But it is not necessary. I think that it takes a strong photographer to use a body in a way to display something other than a suggestive sexual nature. Take these photos for example:
Bill Durgin. Master of sculpture.
Sarah Kaufman. http://www.sarahkaufmanphoto.com/
Master of color/light. While nudes are used within frame, it becomes more-so apparent to me that Sarah can SEE color and light. The body completes the photograph in secondary nature for me. For me, the body comments to the already present light and color situation. It takes on the color and light of the environment as well as giving off it's own color and light. I argue that the bodies within frame are not posed for sexual connotation. But that does not negate the fact that one could consider these as sexual images. The best way to sum up my thoughts most recently above: Even in the best effort to reduce a body to purely interacting as canvas within frame, or in the most innocent attempt to portray nudity as secondary it can always potentially be misread. This is such with any photograph. Our ideas/concepts explored as artists cannot speak for what the audience might see. This is why I find critique time so crucial. I cannot see what others can. I can choose to see.
Sally Mann.
etc.
While I think that it is an artist few and far between that can use body in a way that is not taken as immediately sexual, the subject will always intrigue me. Why do we find certain images sexual, etc.? Thomas Ruff, what of his work?
It is never my place to disregard the work of another artist. If someone is to pursue the subject of nudity I encourage them to write, to research, to blog. (as any artist should do with any subject being explored) What does nudity truly mean to you? Why include it/why not? Can a photo with a nude be purely done for beauty or composition or light? Even if you don't know the answers, or how to find them, consider everything; always.
As an artist I disagree with the subject of nudity being explored only because of the fact that it has become an immediately responsive subject. I disagree with including nudity only for the fact of creating tension due to a society pressured take on a naked body. I disagree with a lot of (what I see as) sexual disturbing art. But in the same token, I cannot disregard it. I need to face the art world, if you will, and all that it is.
In a whirlwind of the past few weeks, I have been both at center of exploring personal nudity and being subject of such. I will not disregard this. I will embrace what became of it. My body is my own. How I choose to protect it is ultimately my own decision. While it is easy to get caught up in the passion of photography, in the sweat, tears, and laughter that come from the process, I have to respect myself and who I am to others. To be the most honest that I have been on this blog... I trust this audience. But regardless, you are all still an audience. And as far as comfort goes... no, comfort is not always good. I also cannot disregard how others might view my body.
Being an artist is one facet of my life. It is in the midst (the marshmallow between graham crackers and chocolate) of my soul, my beliefs, my passions, my desires, my love for another, my day-to-day life. My art is an extension of my labels, my definitions from others, my own definitions about myself. It is not always easy to encompass title of artist, as many relate me to delusional, moody, free-spirited, poor, loser, psychotic (which, I'm not arguing that I'm not those things). But with that comes the idea that I have to sort of give in to what art has a reputation of being... sexual, unmoving, simple, stupid, etc. That is bull. I am Jacki. All of you using this space know me fairly well. I don't create because it comes easy to me. I don't create enlarged guns made of life savers and accept an award for that long worked half-hour. I don't create misspelled (sp?) ... band posters. I create because it lights a fire in my soul, it challenges me as a person to question my motives, my placement, my life. It makes me feel really fucking mad and lost most of the time. Being an artist means that I can create, it also means that I have to embrace my faults, my discomforts, my fears. Creating means that I must stand up to what I believe I need to and respect where I somehow fall in the middle of many other entangled thoughts, concerns, perceptions, and worries. I have to respect who I choose to love. That won't change.
I am a body. I am a canvas. I am hands, arms, teeth, hair, legs, back, shoulders, ovaries, eyes. I am living. I am growing (physically/metaphorically).
Labels:
Jacki
October 16, 2010
A good singer is a better photographer
I did not realized this until my brother mentioned it to me today, but the great singer Bryan Adams (Yes, we all love Summer of 69') is also a brilliant photographer. I have seen alot of photographers work, and researched alot of work by artists, but I still am going to sound like a stereotypical photographer, and say how much I love Annie Leibovitz's portrait work. I just recently watched a bio on PBS about her and how she has grown as a photographer through the years and it was very inspiring me. I have started to feel that way about Bryan Adams now...I am a sucker for his work and hers. They bring so much feeling into their portraits... I feel for them, like I would like someone to feel for mine. So here are a few examples: First five are Bryan's and the last three are Annie's...
Labels:
Mary
October 15, 2010
Something to think about
I've been reading a book called Reality Hunger by David Shields. It is at once a collage work and a manifesto declaring collage as the postmodern movement, etc. Anyway, one thing he says (and I can't locate the exact quote) is something like this: Editing is the most important and powerful tool available to the postmodern artist. Each of you is capable of making a good image. I've seen good images recently posted by Jacki, Mary, Sam, Monica (am I missing anyone?). I believe each of you must work on creating yet stronger individual images. But at the same time, you MUST learn to be stronger editors. Remember the Dump Metaphor? Contemplate it. And when you're done contemplating it, contemplate more. Each of you is jumping around so much, searching for the answer. You can not forget that your answers are small, but they're are right there, hiding, within each of your present photos. Stop fleeing what you're doing now and, instead, dive into it. Each of you has answers already. Take the risk to look. The answers are always right in front of you. Sam, you have your family. Mary, you have your father. Jacki, you have your wont to provide traces of yourself. Monica, you have your drive to remove yourself from your images. Or, whatever you have. Stop avoiding. Stop taking the Google approach to your art and, instead, dive. Scholars of the past would research one thing 20 hours a day, wake up the next day and do the same. You are the Google generation: know little about much. STOP! DIVE. DIVE DEEPER. You need to trust yourselves, your fears, your passions. Trust. Risk.
OK, I'm rambling. If you post questions or comments I'll try to elaborate.
Labels:
Shane
October 14, 2010
October 13, 2010
Assignment #3 and #2 photos
Assignment 2 photos:
To be honest, I didn't want to post any of the pics I took over the weekend, because I simply wasn't feeling them. But I did anyway because I know this is a process and one that can be frustrating at times. I had much more time and a variety of places to go for my first assignment, and I was limited over the weekend, but regardless here are some images out of just 50 or so that I shot on Saturday.
I wasn't sure where to start, so I got in my car like always and started to drive. Since it was long weekend vacation I was at home, although I worked most of the time, but that got me thinking. What if I followed the lawn mowing route and stopped and shot photos of the things that caught my eye? That's just what I did. None of the photos have any particular feelings or meaning, just purely photographs that I captured because I was drawn to them for some reason - unknown even to me. I'm not thrilled about any of them and it was hard for me to even post them, but feedback would be nice in any case ;)
Assignment 3: Oct. 10-Oct. 16
cap to every that Me, seemed different down the never and and this - before. am on the and upper
(I'll be in Chicago this weekend: if any movie shootings are going on I can't promise that some of my photos won't be of attractive looking men....oh jake gyllenhaal.... :P)
Peace!
To be honest, I didn't want to post any of the pics I took over the weekend, because I simply wasn't feeling them. But I did anyway because I know this is a process and one that can be frustrating at times. I had much more time and a variety of places to go for my first assignment, and I was limited over the weekend, but regardless here are some images out of just 50 or so that I shot on Saturday.
I wasn't sure where to start, so I got in my car like always and started to drive. Since it was long weekend vacation I was at home, although I worked most of the time, but that got me thinking. What if I followed the lawn mowing route and stopped and shot photos of the things that caught my eye? That's just what I did. None of the photos have any particular feelings or meaning, just purely photographs that I captured because I was drawn to them for some reason - unknown even to me. I'm not thrilled about any of them and it was hard for me to even post them, but feedback would be nice in any case ;)
Assignment 3: Oct. 10-Oct. 16
cap to every that Me, seemed different down the never and and this - before. am on the and upper
(I'll be in Chicago this weekend: if any movie shootings are going on I can't promise that some of my photos won't be of attractive looking men....oh jake gyllenhaal.... :P)
Peace!
Labels:
Sam
October 10, 2010
A New Journey is About to Begin...
Ok...So I have not added photos in awhile on here. I still don't have any I would like to share (not because they are secret, just because I am not "feeling" any of them), but I was truly inspired today, and I am ready to start a journey, and just see where it will lead me... I have absolutely NO idea if it will go anywhere, and that is what excites me. I haven't had that feeling in awhile.
I was struggling with even starting to shoot, so I decided I just needed to read photography books. I had to listen to other artists and mostly photographer's words to inspire me. I was not being able to do it on me own. Well I was in Chicago this weekend with my boyfriend, and we went to Borders. He proceeded to the History section on the basement level, and I to the Art section on the top floor...interesting the separation. I sat on the floor right in the middle of the aisle and started to pull books off the shelf. I had piles around me. I laid down on the floor using my jacket as a pillow. I proceeded to weed out the ones I wasn't interested in. In a hour, I had found 5 books that intrigued me. I opened one, and it was about a history of Nude photography... Interesting to me, partly because we had never been able to shoot nudes, but for another reason as well... This is where the journey started.
I have recently found out that my oldest sister has been diagnosed with breast cancer. We do not know what stage she is in yet. She has a tumor in her breast and they are doing surgery on her on Monday (tomorrow) and then finding out if it has spread and from there, if it has, radiation or chemotherapy, if it hasn't spread, awesome! As most of you know, my mom passed away after a two year fight with cancer...However, you may not know, that my dad fought cancer when my mom was fighting hers as well. I also had my own fight with cancer a long time ago, and now my oldest sister, who has a family of 4 herself fight her own battle. That is more then 50% of my immediate family that has had this disease "haunt" us. I have always wanted to shoot pictures of my dad, because secretly I think he is a super hero to watch two of his children fight cancer, his wife pass away from it, to fight it himself, and in the past to also watch his son killed by a car and his house burn to the ground while trying to get his family out. However, it is not my time to do that yet...I know that. That is for a special time. With that point aside...I would like to focus on this enemy that has taken a inspirational woman from my life, has inflicted my life forever, and who continues to plague my family! I would like to meet others who have seen death possibly and fought it and decided to grab the bastard and throw it to the ground! I would like to hear what other people think about this incurable and unpredictable hell. So, the next start of my journey was:
I am a child cancer survivor. I am a person who has lost someone they dearly love to cancer. I have 6 people in my immediate family, and 4 of them have had/still have cancer. I am all these things, but I am also a photographer. I am someone who wants to hear from YOU, and to see YOU and to possibly photograph YOU. I would like to understand, or know what other people feel towards this unpredictable enemy. I would like to hear those words from you or from those you know who have faced this similar things...I would like to bring awareness through you. I am not sure if I will be successful, but all I can is try. I am someone small in this world, but I have faced much, and I would like to see much more...Can you help me? If you can, or if you know anyone who would talk to me about their experience with cancer, I hope very much that you will call me, so I can add your story to mine, and help others to just begin to understand and be aware of what you and I have felt already... PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO ANYONE YOU MAY KNOW. Children, Elderly, Moms, Sisters, Fathers, Brothers, Friends are all welcome...
Here is my #
The ball is in your court now...
Thank You
MCB
facebook.com/MCBcancerjourney (in process right now)
This is the poster that I have made and am going to put up around towns, hospitals, restaurants etc... I hope people will tell me their story and eventually let me photograph them. I am going to record them and document their experiences. I would like this to be something...I am not sure what...but I thought I would let THEM help me with the journey.
This is one of my two journeys I have decided to explore. I will put this up now...and let you know in a bit how the other one is going and update you about this one...
THE END
Labels:
Mary
October 3, 2010
Assignment #2 and #1 photos
Assignment 2: 10/2-9
his spoke him advice. living been lawn tell allowance keeps family been you was facts has taking the today. pigs
Assignment 1 recap
When I picked out the 20 words and typed them up, I printed them out on a square 2-inch piece of paper that I then taped them to the back of my camera. I never knew buying the Nikon D5000 with the 360-degree screen would come in so handy. Not only can I tape the words on the black plastic part so that they are always facing me when I'm taking pictures, but my digital is also acting more like my film camera in that I am not reviewing my pictures after each shot - it's a surprise :) My goal is to shoot about 200 photos/assignment, more if possible, but to do so patiently and diligently with a wide variety.
I wasn't quite sure where to start, but since it was such a beautiful sunny day on Wednesday I had to get in my car and drive. Not knowing where to go, I searched MapQuest for any streets or towns named "Katie" in the area, and the map said there was a Katie Lane near Kaukana in a small town called Holland. I printed out the directions and just drove, stopping occasionally to take photos of the landscape and buildings. When I got into Holland I searched and searched for this Katie Lane, but I never found it.
Back through country roads I was driving when I spotted a small cemetery on a hill. I pulled over and started walking around, looking at the stones. This must have been primarily a family cemetery as only a handful of last names existed, the most populous being - Ellis and Walker. I wondered who had walked through here, who now rested here, and what the circumstances were. My favorite tombstone was carved like a tree trunk with a book resting on top, with carved ivy and an anchor at the base of the trunk. But what was most interesting was a tombstone that was higher with another book on top, with a real vine plant crawling up its base and almost covering the inscriptions. This tombstone almost looked out over the graveyard and the city in the backyard. I could even see the blue water tower from this angle. As I peered back to my camera to read the words, I wondered what made me stop the car and walk up here. Maybe I had thought about the shoes that had walked there, but when I left I realized that it was really the breathing that was there and still is because of the plants and trees. I admit, it was weird walking there by myself in the middle of nowhere, but it was also peaceful and not spooky like I thought it would be.
I decided to ditch the maps and try to find my way back to campus through the back roads, and wouldn't you know it, about an hour later I wound up driving on X past a dead end called Video Lane. I didn't even know this road existed. So I turned around and drove down it, and it led to a huge asphalt plant. As I came closer to the fence, I looked to my right and there was a radio tower that looked like the building had a UFO on top - it was very strange. At the same time a dump truck sped down the straight gravel path - certainly not abiding by the 10 mph speed limit sign. He looked at me and gave me a strange look, but as I hadn't gone past the fence, he couldn't tell me I was trespassing. If you've ever seen the movie Erin Brokovich, it was this strange place out in nowhere and I felt like Julia Roberts sneaking water samples that were probably contaminated due to toxins. I don't know why, but it just did not seem like a Wisconsin place, it seemed foreign, and I felt slightly uneasy being there.
On Friday my mom came up to visit. We planned on driving up to Door County, but we had a late start, so we decided to drive to Sherwood to High Cliff State Park and did some hiking. We had a great time - it was beautiful weather, the trees were just starting to change, we climbed the look-out tower, and joked that the carved steps down the cliff looked like something out of the movie Lord of the Rings. She was being sarcastic and pretended to be Gandalf in the Mines of Moria saying, "Don't come here!" I started laughing, "Mom, you mean, 'You shall not pass?'" We were both walking along narrow, steep paths, and her agility surprised me. Not that she isn't fit, but she's had so many back problems and health issues that she must have been energized by being out in nature, as was I. Not wanting to waste daylight, we decided to drive on, hoping to make it to another state park taking Highway 10 to Two Rivers on the shore of Lake Michigan, but it started to get cloudy.
Earlier we had driven past an old barn and abandoned house where a sign said "POSTED, No Hunting, Fishing, Trespassing." Where exactly you could fish on this plot of weedy land is beyond me, but the point was clear - don't enter here. The driveway was even padlocked, though it would have been easy to just drive around it. We pulled over and I walked along the side of the road and changed to a zoom lens. My mom called out, "Aren't you going to go inside?" I couldn't believe she said that, my mom whom I thought always played by the rules. "Are you crazy?" I shouted back. I've been in enough trouble, I thought, but I was still curious. There didn't seem to be any cars driving along the road, but there was a sharp curve so you couldn't really be sure. I started to step closer and closer to the house, but it was still a ways off when I suddenly heard a vehicle zooming towards us. I freaked out and ran back to the car where my mom was swinging her legs back and forth from the end of the SUV and eating the caramel apple we had just bought at an orchard a few miles back. She was so calm, almost child-like in that moment, and we both laughed as got back in and drove on.
Later we went to Brillion. That is the town my mom grew up in until she was four, and she had mentioned she had never been back to see her house. She wasn't sure she even remembered where it was located. But she called her older brother and he gave some vague directions. As we entered Brillion, I saw a restaurant that looked like it came out of the 50s. When my mom saw Rudy's too, she knew she was close. She remarked that she didn't know where to go next, but as if she was remembering her surroundings with ease, at the next street (Columbus Avenue) she turned right and drove very slowly not keeping to her lane. "I have a picture of me on the sidewalk that wrapped around our house to the backyard, there was a fence there." She said she didn't know if this was right, but suddenly she stopped the car in the middle of the road and just stared out her window to the left. "Is that it?" I asked. She said nothing, just stared. As if to herself, "They didn't change the color. I was afraid they'd paint it a different color." Then as we drove on, she spotted it - the sidewalk. This was it. She pulled the car around and parked on that side of the street. I asked her if she wanted a picture with the house, and she said yes, all the while very silent. First she stood in the driveway. "This must be over 50 years old - look at how cracked it still is, and the same garage, too." And it was, cracks and weeds growing up all over, a tiny blue and white garage that looked like it could barely hold one car. I took a few shots of her as she walked to the door, "Should I ring the doorbell? Oh, look, it's the same one as we had." She knocked and rang, but no one came to the door. The only real change, she said, was the big plastic bear that greeted you as you walked in, and there was no fence in the back yard. She was adamant that I didn't get the bear in the photo of her as she stood on the porch steps. As we got in the car and continued driving, we had other conversations, but she would interrupt saying things like, "I didn't really want to come back here, but I'm glad I did," and "Isn't it strange that I found it on the first try?" I know she wasn't looking for a response, she was in her own world, but I was glad to have been there with her as she experienced this "on familiar wonder, the exactly familiarity she came."
Labels:
Sam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)